When I was in grade school my adviser chose me to be the one of the master of ceremony in certain event. I gave speech in front of my fellow student, teachers and parents. While they waiting the programs started I made some strategy like using metaphor to the participants of event on how they look like to their costume to make them entertain and interesting but when I did some interview to the participants which is scripted they made bored, some not listen and made noise. It rejected the audiences because it seems planned and lack of delivered and style which is not effective to the listener it not made them convinced or persuade. Naturalness is persuasive according to Aristotle canon of rhetoric in delivery. Yes, I am agree because when it planned it’s noticeable and not really persuasive and you just make yourself harder. I trying to make myself as an effective speaker so I used some rhetoric words but before I do not know what is called in this but now that I learned I know that it is rhetoric a kind of art in speaking and writing an exact term in what I did before. In my speech it is different to what I learned in rhetoric of Aristotle. According to him raised rhetoric to a science by systematically exploring the effects of the speaker, the speech and the audience. He regarded the speaker’s use of knowledge as an art. I said that it is differ because I cannot explored myself as I am just the way we planned and scripted but somehow I explored my speaking little arts it persuade the audience but it not delivered naturalness. This is just my first time so I not blame myself instead I am glad that I experience to be master of ceremony and there is some positive comments. In dramatism of Burkes every people open their mouth to communicate is described as drama. I really agree too that if there is no identification no persuasion and there is some similarity when I interview the participants in this event some had similarity on my personality. I never forget that one of the participant has similarity on me because of her physical characteristics and some of our belief. Not just because of that but I as a speaker and fellow students as audiences it had a big impact of identification we have because we experience the same being students and some of the attitudes and beliefs on how we regulate school and discipline teachers. In narrative paradigm of Fisher it is different having speech in front because according to what I understand it looks like compelling of story and every event or happenings happen is considered a story. I noticed that the three theories rhetoric, dramatism and narrative paradigm is all persuading the audience and it is a new effective tip making a good speaker and speech.
During my high school most of the groupings I chose leader because some knows that I am responsible according also to my adviser. I am not intelligent but I am a diligent student . I always handle conflicts and problems because most of the group members cannot participate. Being leader I responsible in all works of the group even it is unfair. It should be our group works as one so it should work all of the member’s .Some members having conflicts to me because of misunderstanding about the planned. So I should I improve my communication by utilizing four functions which are problem analysis which u should know the problem and take every opinions of the members. Second is the goal setting, it is how your procedure of planned achieved the goal. It also use the identification of alternatives which ensure the quality of decision making and it gives some techniques to do so. Lastly, the evaluation of positives and negatives before making final decision. It can result in a high quality of decision. I improved also my communication within my group by utilizing fantasy themes because we can share interpretation that is creative and imaginative which is chain out within the group and it is essential to response a content of dramatizing message of the members.
Cultural approach is likely to embody my future career which is different things to different people because I want to learned different cultures while I have my companionship with others. I want the position of the managerial because it control and decide some strategy instead of being employee just having participation and involvement that is free expression of ideas but no voice and without democracy in work place.